Of the four grains used in making whiskey, wheat is the
one least represented. During my
research, I found very little information on the topic. Most of my literature concerns itself with
Rye, Scotch, and Bourbon. Wheat is mentioned,
but as an additional ingredient to a mash, not as its own whiskey. The internet
followed a similar line of reasoning, but it had a few more bits of
information. Whiskey.Com had more information on wheat whiskey than any other
resource I could find.
So what is wheat whiskey?
Well, as the name implies, its whiskey distilled from a wheat mash. I was only able to find two sources on its
regulation. They both agree that the
whiskey be distilled from a mash bill of at least 51 percent wheat, with the
rest of the mash made up of other grains.
Bernheim Whiskey states that
its whiskey is aged for two years in a new, charred white oak barrel. This conforms to a similar requirement in the
U.S. for a rye whiskey to be labeled as “straight.” Whiskey.Com states that the age requirement
is three years. Neither site states the
ABV of the whiskey before maturation.
As I mentioned earlier, wheat whiskey is under-represented
in the whiskey world. For my
experimentations, I was only able to find two locally, and neither can be
considered straight whiskies.
The first whiskey my friends and I tried was Koval MidwestWheat Whiskey. It is made using
100 percent “organic” wheat. It is un-aged, so it’s perfectly clear. The bouquet was baffling, in that all of us
came up with different scents. Aside
from different noses, we all let our drinks breathe for different lengths of
time, which had a noticeable effect. I
got a light bread or doughy smell, while my friends got hints of vanilla,
licorice, and unripe banana/green plantain.
On tasting, I had white pepper “tingle” on the tongue with a finish that
was short and sweet, like frozen green grapes.
Not everyone got the pepper, but they all got some sort of fruity/citric
character from it. We all agreed that for
an un-aged whiskey, it was smoother than expected.
The other whiskey we tried was Buffalo Trace White Dog
Wheated Mash. They state, quite proudly
I might add, that it is un-aged. It,
too, is perfectly clear. Now, the
difference from this whiskey and Koval’s is that it is not 100 percent
wheat. In fact, it is very likely that
wheat makes up less than 51 percent of the mash bill. So why did I get it? Well, I like Buffalo Trace as a company and
this product is very similar to their bourbon recipe, replacing the rye with
wheat. Also, the selection for wheat
whiskey is fairly limited. But I
digress. The bouquet was the first cause
for debate. We came up with all sorts of
descriptions: active dry yeast (the kind
you add to warm water), grappa, sourdough, and sour wine. Again, scents waxed and waned when it was
allowed to breathe. The second debate
was the taste. I got a light oatmeal
taste with a smooth finish, while someone else got Easter Bunny eyes (a kind of
“dull” candy taste) with a cognac-like finish.
I didn’t get any of the pepper I tasted with the other whiskey. Again, it was smoother than what you would
expect from an un-aged whiskey at 115 proof.
As with Rye, there seems to be an increase in the demand for
wheat whiskey. Whereas Rye is having a
revival, Wheat is having its dawning.
From what I have gathered through research and shopping for wheat
whiskey, it has only been in small batch production since 2005. Perhaps it is the novelty of trying something
new and different that is creating the demand.
I should also note that both of these spirits were not aged, which
segues into the moonshine/poitÃn fad that seems to be developing. Whatever the reason, whether it enjoys the
same level of success as its brother and sister grains is anybody’s guess.